STX Next
Wrocław, Poland · 500+ employees
European software house specializing in AWS and Snowflake data engineering
- ✓ 500+ engineers globally
- ✓ 20+ years experience
- ✓ Certified Snowflake & AWS partner
Industries:
Notable clients:
Google, Decathlon
Vetted firms for Snowflake, Redshift, and BigQuery migrations. These agencies have delivered 60+ successful data warehouse projects for mid-market and enterprise companies.
Most teams budget 20% of project time for data quality issues. Reality: it's 40-60%. Your source systems have undocumented business logic, inconsistent formats, and orphaned records. Discovery happens during migration, not before.
Fix: Add 50% buffer to your timeline specifically for data quality remediation. Have your agency provide a data profiling report before finalizing project scope.
Snowflake's marketing is excellent. Their pricing model punishes certain query patterns. Redshift excels at predictable workloads but struggles with ad-hoc analysis. BigQuery's serverless model creates unpredictable costs.
Fix: Document your top 20 queries before platform selection. Calculate projected costs for each platform using actual query patterns, not vendor benchmarks.
Moving your Oracle data warehouse schema directly to Snowflake wastes cloud advantages. On-premise patterns (stored procedures, heavy ETL) become expensive cloud patterns.
Fix: Redesign for cloud-native patterns: ELT over ETL, columnar storage optimization, separation of compute and storage. This takes more upfront time but reduces long-term costs by 40-60%.
Migrating everything at once maximizes risk. One failure cascades. Rollback becomes impossible. Stakeholders lose confidence.
Fix: Phased migration with parallel running. Migrate one business domain at a time. Run old and new systems in parallel for 2-4 weeks. Validate data accuracy before cutting over.
| Feature | Snowflake | AWS Redshift | Google BigQuery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Pay-per-second compute | Reserved + on-demand | Pay-per-query (TB scanned) |
| Best For | Multi-cloud, data sharing | AWS-native organizations | Serverless analytics |
| Compute Scaling | Instant, automatic | Manual or scheduled | Automatic (serverless) |
| Data Sharing | Excellent (native feature) | Limited | Good (within GCP) |
| Cost Predictability | Variable (usage-based) | High (reserved capacity) | Variable (query-based) |
| Learning Curve | Moderate | Steep (PostgreSQL knowledge helps) | Low (standard SQL) |
Platform choice should be driven by existing cloud investments, team expertise, and query patterns—not vendor marketing.
26 agencies with proven data warehouse expertise. Each has been verified for technical capability, client references, and delivery track record.
Wrocław, Poland · 500+ employees
European software house specializing in AWS and Snowflake data engineering
Industries:
Notable clients:
Google, Decathlon
Seattle, USA · 6,000+ employees
Snowflake Elite Partner with 2,700+ projects delivered
Industries:
Notable clients:
270+ enterprise customers
Denver, USA · 200+ employees
Modern data stack implementation with Fivetran, dbt, and Snowflake
Industries:
Notable clients:
Mid-market to enterprise companies
New York, USA · 30+ employees
dbt and analytics engineering pioneers
Industries:
Notable clients:
High-growth tech companies
Brighton, UK · 50+ employees
dbt and modern data stack implementation
Industries:
Notable clients:
Global companies
USA · 60+ employees
Snowflake AI Data Cloud implementation
Industries:
Notable clients:
Enterprise companies
Lviv, Ukraine · 2,000+ employees
Full-stack data warehouse and big data solutions
Industries:
Notable clients:
Global enterprises
Austin, USA · 800+ employees
Data management and analytics consulting since 1989
Industries:
Notable clients:
Mid-market to enterprise
Global · 300+ employees
Data engineering and AI solutions for CPG and pharma
Industries:
Notable clients:
Fortune 500 CPG companies
Global (17 countries) · 10,000+ employees
Software and data engineering with engineering excellence
Industries:
Notable clients:
Enterprise companies
USA · 400+ employees
Databricks and MLflow implementation
Industries:
Notable clients:
Enterprise clients
USA · 150+ employees
Databricks data platform and machine learning
Industries:
Notable clients:
Enterprise companies
USA · 200+ employees
Data engineering and cloud architecture
Industries:
Notable clients:
Enterprise clients
USA · 50+ employees
Snowflake consulting with financial services focus
Industries:
Notable clients:
Financial services companies
USA · 200+ employees
AWS data warehouse and analytics
Industries:
Notable clients:
AstraZeneca, Enterprise companies
Current state analysis, data profiling, source system inventory, business requirements gathering, and ROI modeling. Deliverable: Technical assessment report with recommendations.
Platform selection rationale, data modeling (dimensional vs. data vault), security architecture, integration patterns, and cost projections. Deliverable: Architecture decision record and detailed design.
ETL/ELT pipeline development, data migration scripts, schema implementation, testing (unit, integration, UAT), and performance tuning. Deliverable: Working data warehouse with validated data.
Query performance tuning, cost optimization, monitoring and alerting setup, team training, and documentation. Deliverable: Optimized system with trained internal team.
Data warehouse consulting projects typically cost between $150,000 and $800,000 for mid-market companies. Here's a detailed breakdown:
Factors that increase costs include legacy system complexity, data quality issues, compliance requirements (HIPAA, SOC2), and multi-cloud deployments. Greenfield implementations on modern platforms like Snowflake typically cost 30-40% less than legacy migrations.
Each platform has specific strengths:
Snowflake: Best for multi-cloud flexibility, variable workloads, and data sharing. Excels at separating compute from storage. Higher per-query costs but easier to manage. Best for: Companies needing multi-cloud or frequent data sharing.
AWS Redshift: Best for AWS-heavy organizations. Strong BI tool integration. More predictable costs with reserved capacity. Best for: Teams already invested in AWS ecosystem.
Google BigQuery: Best for real-time analytics and companies using Google Cloud. Serverless architecture means zero infrastructure management. Best for: Analytics-heavy workloads with unpredictable patterns.
Don't choose based on vendor marketing. Choose based on your existing cloud investments, query patterns, and team expertise.
The top mistakes that derail data warehouse projects:
This depends on your situation:
Hire an agency when:
Build internal team when:
Many companies use a hybrid approach: agency for initial migration and architecture, internal team for ongoing operations.
Comprehensive data warehouse consulting typically includes:
Ensure your agency contract explicitly includes knowledge transfer. Agencies that create dependency rather than capability aren't serving your interests.
Realistic timelines for data warehouse migrations:
These estimates include discovery, design, implementation, testing, and parallel running. Agencies that promise faster timelines are either cutting corners or underestimating your complexity. Add 30% buffer for unexpected data quality issues—they always appear.
Tell us about your migration project. We'll match you with agencies that specialize in your target platform and industry.
Get Matched with DW Agencies